فنّانون على أبواب جهنّم..!!

كنتُ أنتظر بشوق مسلسل ( دُعاة على أبواب جهنم ) ..لأكثر من سبب ..وأنا لمّا أستنّى إشي ..تنحرق أعصابي وأعصاب إللي معي ..وتمنيتُ أن يأتي رمضان باكراً ..!! وأتى ..وشاهدتُ الحلقة الأولى ..قلت يا ولد معلش ؛ هاي الحلقة الأولى ..أصْبُرْ ..وصبرنا..فأجت الحلقة الثانية ..أصبُرْ يا ولد ..وصبرنا..!! والثالثة والرابعة و..و...و... واصبر يا ولد ..وصبرنا ..!!

جميع الدُّعاة في المسلسل ( لا يضحكون ..لا يبتسمون.. )..جامدون وكأنهم دُعاة في أفلام كرتون ..!! ياناس ..يا بشر ..الذين تتكلّمون عنهم ؛ أكثر الناس خفة للدم وأكثرهم ابتساماً وبشاشة ..!! فحتى الزرقاوي ..عندما عرفته في السجن ..كان صاحب نكتة و صاحب ظرافة ويبتسم دائماً ..!! فلماذا الإصرار على التجهّم الأبدي والكشرة إللي تقطع الخَلَف..!!

ماشي يا عم ..بسيطة ..نحكي نقطة الكشرة نقطة سطحية ومش هالمشكلة الكبيرة ..!! طيب ..كيف أصبح هؤلاء إرهابيين ..؟؟ كيف يرضى كاتب على نفسه أن يُظهر جانباً ويخفي جانباً ..؟؟ من الذي علّم دُعاة الإرهاب الإهاب ..؟؟ هل الحكومات التي ظهرت في المسلسل بريئة من هؤلاء ..؟؟ ألا يوجد من عذّبهم ..شحشطهم ..أساء إليهم ..؟؟ هكذا حملوا الارهاب من أفغانستان وصاروا يفتشوا على كل شيء جميل ليقتلوه ...!! حراااااااااااام عليكم ..هؤلاء الناس ليسوا كذلك ..وإن اعتقدتم أنهم كذلك ..فستبقى السيطرة لهم ..!!

طيب ..عنوان المسلسل هو ..دعاة على أبواب جهنم ..مزبوط ..؟؟ ماشي ..هل العنوان مُحايد ..أم أنه يأخذ طرفاً ..!! عندما يقرر حضرة الكاتب أن هؤلاء العيّنات التي رسمها لنا ..سيدخلون جهنّم ..من الذي أعطاه حق التكفير ..ألم يفعل الكاتب نفس فعل تلك الجماعات عندما تقوم بالتكفير..؟؟؟!! وهل يحق لأحد أن يُبدي وجهة نظره فيقول ( فنّانون على أبواب جهنّم ) ..يا ترى ..ما رأي القائمين على العمل إن سوّينا زيهم ..بنفس منهج التفكير ..؟؟

لا أنكر أن العمل متعوب عليه ..والممثلون اجتهدوا جدا في آداء المكتوب ..ولكن النص ظالم بكل المقاييس ..وهو نص يحمل وجهة نظر رسميّة ..ولا يأتي على جهة الحكومات وأوضاع المعتقلين بالسجون العربيّة !!..وإلاّ انظروا هل سيعلق في الذاكرة شيئاً منه غير الضحك من جديد ..!!

لديّ اقتراح..ليش ما ينعمل مسلسل عن إرهاب قناة الغور الشرقيّة ..إللي كل سنة تبلع كوكبة من الأطفال ..ليش ..قولولي..؟؟..وإلاّ إللي بيرهبوا الناس في الأغور ما بيطلعلهم ..؟؟؟ ..أنا مستعد أتبرع بكتابة المسلسل ..ومستعد أخرجه كمان ..وإذا بدكو أمثّل ما عندي مانع ولا
لولب..بس ..بدنا دراما لا تدعم الحكومات ..بل تدعم الشعوب وتنهض بها ..!!لأن الحكومات تعرف كيف تدبِّر حالها أما الشعوب ؛ ضايعة بين الرِجْلين ..والمشكلة الرِّجْلين مش مغسّلات من اسبوع .. إِفْ إِف..الشعوب ماتت من الريحة ..!!


...
abo_baghdad@yahoo.com

المصدر : موقع  الكاتب الساخر كامل النصيرات
http://www.maktoobblog.com/kamel-nsirat?post=112057

¶ Monday, October 09, 2006 0 comments

China jamming test sparks U.S. satellite concerns
Thu Oct 5, 2006 5:23 PM ET

By Andrea Shalal-Esa

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - China has beamed a ground-based laser at U.S. spy satellites over its territory, a U.S. agency said, in an action that exposed the potential vulnerability of space systems that provide crucial data to American troops and consumers around the world.


The Defense Department remains tight-lipped about details, including which satellite was involved or when it occurred.

The Pentagon's National Reconnaissance Office Director Donald Kerr last week acknowledged the incident, first reported by Defense News, but said it did not materially damage the U.S. satellite's ability to collect information.

"It makes us think," Kerr told reporters.

The issue looms large, given that U.S. military operations have rapidly grown more reliant on satellite data for everything from targeting bombs to relaying communications to spying on enemy nations.

Critical U.S. space assets include a constellation of 30 Global Positioning Satellites that help target bombs and find enemy locations. This system is also widely used in commercial applications, ranging from car navigation systems to automatic teller machines.

The Pentagon also depends on communications satellites that relay sensitive messages to battlefield commanders, and satellites that track weather in critical areas so U.S. troops can plan their missions.

"Space is a much bigger part of our military posture than it used to be, so any effort by the Chinese or anybody else to jam our satellites is potentially a big deal," said Loren Thompson, defense analyst with the Virginia-based Lexington Institute.

FRESH CONCERNS

Clearly, the incident sparked fresh concerns among U.S. officials and watchdog groups about the U.S. ability to determine if satellite problems are caused by malfunctions, weather anomalies like solar flares, or targeted attacks.

Air Force Space Commander Gen. Kevin Chilton said it was often difficult to know exactly what happened to satellites orbiting from 125 to 22,400 miles above the earth.

"We're at a point where the technology's out there and the capability for people to do things to our satellites is there. I'm focused on it beyond any single event," Chilton said.

Satellites are also vulnerable to man-made and natural events affecting their ground stations and the links between the station and the satellite, he told reporters last week.

Theresa Hitchens of the Center for Defense Information cautioned against jumping to conclusions about the Chinese incident.

Beijing may have been testing its capability to track satellites, not damage them, Hitchens said. "We don't know their intent, and we don't have the capability to know."

Hitchens also noted current technology made it difficult to identify anything smaller than a baseball in the orbits where spy satellites fly, a capability that needed to be improved.

At the same time, she said, the Pentagon would be prudent to use lower-cost and lower-risk systems closer to earth to do some critical tasks like surveillance and communications.

ANTI-SATELLITE WEAPONS?

Hitchens also emphasized that it would be extremely difficult to disable a satellite with a laser -- and even U.S. scientists had not developed a system to do that.

But there is growing concern among lawmakers about U.S. efforts to develop such anti-satellite weapons.

House of Representatives lawmakers tried to block a planned test of Starfire, a satellite and star tracking program, for fiscal 2007 after learning it could also be used as an anti-satellite weapon. The funds were reinstated only after the Air Force assured lawmakers it would be used only for tracking.

The Chinese incident also underscored the need to develop an international code of conduct for space. Currently, there are no specific rules or treaties governing behavior of the 40 countries that operate satellites, and about a dozen countries that have launch capability, Hitchens said.

¶ Friday, October 06, 2006 0 comments

Those guys behind Kazaa and Skype have started accepting signups for a peer to peer video streaming service they say will deliver high quality full screen TV across the net.…

The Janus Friis and Niklas Zennstrom-backed Venice Project is in internal beta, and should be going to public beta soon. Viewers should be able to watch, well, something before Christmas.

The Venice Project is in discussions with major content providers, including TV companies, and has already truck deals with serious content providers, Friis told El Reg today. The Venice Project will also allow smaller content producers and individuals to upload their content. The service will be supported by advertising.

Friis and Zennstrom's time at Kazaa was marked by trench warfare with the big record companies, but this time they are nailing down the copyright issues before the service goes live.

"This is not a file sharing network," said Friis, adding that “We have a lot of experience with copyright.”. The service will be DMCA compliant, and content providers will be able to “de-authorise” content, he said. At the same time, if users upload illicit material, he said, it can be tracked down and taken off.

From the viewer's point of view, Friis is promising something that combines the best of the TV, i.e. professionally-produced content that tells a story, with the internet's ability to search for and access content on a whim, produce favourites list, forward these to friends along with comments, and the like. Users will create their own channels which could span programmes from the big production houses, independent documentaries, home movies and You Tube-like clips.

"This is a secure P2P network," added Friis. Users simply need to download the client software. Content providers will be able to access tools to upload their content, and crucially, ensure they get a cut of the advertising revenue it generates.

When content is uploaded, files will be atomized, Bittorrent-like, and distributed around the users on the network. However, users will be able to access the content as streams, giving the same sort of viewing experience they would expect from television.

Or at least that's the aim. Right now the service is in an internal beta, so outsiders can't see it. When it goes to open Beta, the company will use a Gmail-type viral invitation to spread the word - and generate a tidal wave of interest and hype.

The TV venture is backed by Friis and Zennstom, together with private investment. Friis said the company had offices in Europe and the US. Most of the development is being done in Europe. However, he was vague on where the firm is actually headquartered.

Friis and Zennstom still have day jobs at eBay - the internet bazaar bought Skype last year. Friis said the new project would not upset relations with their employer. He said The Venice Project “sits quite well“ with eBay “ adding: "Meg [Whitman, eBay CEO] is very encouraging."

Zennstrom will continue as CEO of Skype, and will be on the board of the new project. Friis is also on the board of The Venice Project, but in a much more active role. He retains his Skype title of director of strategy and innovation. The Venice Project's CEO is Fredrik de Wahl. The company is not disclosing the names of other board members yet.

¶ Wednesday, October 04, 2006 0 comments

Goggle Translate (beta)

Check out the new google translation service , translate this blog from and to these languages:



If you think this is a good serice, I may add it to my sidebar links !

¶ Sunday, October 01, 2006 1 comments